Taylor’s Takes: Lindsay Clancy’s Witches Three cast hex upon Boston media
The media is looking to redeem the other jurors by holding this one to a different standard because he seems to be an anomaly: a black man that isn’t doing what the white [wo]man is telling him.
It was bad enough that the jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial who decided to step forward had revealed themselves to be grotesque, evil wenches.
Nobody thought that there could be another plot twist waiting around the corner.
But one of the witches-three, Paula Devlin, hesitantly revealed to CBS Morning host Gayle King that the lone holdout juror is a black male.
Dun dun DUUUUUNNN!!!
The reveal would have done Rod Serling proud. It was even fit enough for an M. Night Shyamalan film.
Paula’s interview with the morning host-turned-astronaut seemed to be a life preserver interview. Earlier in the week, NBC 10 Boston’s raging liberal feminist Sue O’Connell helped each of the three jurors who stepped out of anonymity take off their masks and show the world how ignorant and intellectually vapid they are.
The national morning show hit looked to restore the image of those jurors. That is until that stunning moment when Devlin begrudgingly gave up the fact that the standalone juror is a man of color.
So not only are those three jurors (Devlin, Roni Carlson, and Kellie Farina) supportive or apathetic of triple child homicides, sexist, legal illiterate bullies…. THEY’RE ALSO RACISTS!
These women sat in the deliberation room for days on end with six other women and two other men, all of them trying to convince a black man that he was wrong or too stupid to realize what “reasonable doubt” means.
Go figure! It’s such a trope within the Democrat Party that minorities are viewed as a monolith that they took this man’s opinion for granted and spent the better part of a week trying to convince him that he was wrong.
But the horror film that has been this entire trial and its aftermath doesn’t end there.
The same outlet that featured Hades’ Three Fates with “journalist” Sue O’Connell is continuing to do their bidding for them. Its almost as if the entire newsroom was hexed or something. Crazy.
NBC Boston is now chasing down every sordid detail about this anonymous black juror’s life. They’ve spoken with friends, family members, and have even shown up at the man’s house in some sort of intimidation tactic disguised as a newsworthy fact-finding mission.
The outlet has even revealed criminal charges from the man’s past.
How is that relevant? You tell me. I can only say that it speaks ill of the prosecution’s ability to handpick jurors who more than likely don’t have a bias towards law enforcement. They just happened to luck out with this one man who showed more integrity and grit than any of the other jurors ever will.
So much detail has been provided without officially disclosing his name (which is still court-sealed, by the way) that if you only tangentially know this man you would only have to make an educated guess as to his identity and you’d be correct.
And why this juror? Why is only his life under a microscope by the Boston media? There are eleven other jurors. Why am I not being told about their pasts?
Because they’re not black, that’s why.
The media is looking to redeem the other jurors by holding this one to a different standard because he seems to be an anomaly: a black man who isn’t doing what the white [wo]man is telling him.
He’s not an anomaly.
He is a hero.
What he may or may not have done in his past is not relevant to the Lindsay Clancy verdict in the least.
What this all-but-outed juror has, other than his integrity and grit, is a hell of a lawsuit on his hands. Against his will his redacted name has been dragged through the mud, all because of a difference of opinion.
Who would have thought that cancel culture would stoop this low?
I have a jury duty summons for November hanging on my refrigerator door right now. I’m not sure I want to go if this is how I can expect to be treated.
